|
Subscribe |
If you would like to receive
each new issue of Perspectives automatically via e-mail, please
let us know. |
|
www.sibson.com
|
Archive
|
November 22, 2005
Vol. 13 Issue 3
|
August 1, 2005
Vol. 13 Issue 2
|
April 18, 2005
Vol. 13 Issue 1
|
January 12, 2005
Vol. 12 Issue 4
|
October 6, 2004
Vol. XII Issue 3
|
July 1, 2004
Vol. XII Issue 2
|
April 1, 2004
Vol. XII Issue 1
|
January 5, 2004
Vol. XI Issue 4
|
September 30, 2003
Vol. XI Issue 3
|
June 30, 2003
Vol. XI Issue 2
|
March 31, 2003
Vol. XI Issue 1
|
December 31, 2002
Vol. X Issue 4
|
September 30, 2002
Vol. X Issue 3
|
June 27, 2002
Vol. X Issue 2
|
March 27, 2002
Vol. X Issue 1
|
|
|
|  |
 |
 |
Total Health Management:
The Future of Health Care Cost Management?
By Chris Mathews
Rising health care costs were cited as the greatest cost pressure on U.S. businesses
by the largest percentage of CEOs in Business Roundtable's December 2005 CEO Economic
Outlook Survey 43 percent a finding consistent with the association's two previous
annual CEO surveys1.
Headlines routinely confirm that spending on health care for both
active and retired employees is so high that it is endangering the survival of organizations
large and small. Nevertheless, most employers continue to address rising health care
costs by doing little more than increasing employee contributions and/or reducing benefits
but there are limits to this approach in an era of persistent double-digit increases in
health plan costs.
Employers that are approaching health care cost management as a business problem are
dramatically containing increases in health care costs. For example, in 2004 and 2005,
a major airline was able to limit the increase in its overall medical costs to less than
5 percent (without benefit reductions), and a publishing conglomerate achieved a less
than 4 percent increase in its medical and prescription drug costs at a time when many
health plans experienced 15 percent increases. Recognizing that the strategies used to
manage the cost of health care in the managed care era plan design, employee contributions,
traditional medical management, network discounts and streamlining administration are losing
their effectiveness, these employers are in the forefront of what may prove to be a new era
in health care cost management: total health management.
What is Total
Health Management?
The new cost management tools for emerging total health management are designed to address
the real causes of medical cost escalation: consumer health habits, waste in the health
care system, poor quality care and poor preventive care. The tools include providing participant
with and information about high-quality/high-performance providers and access to appropriate
care that follows evidence-based guidelines, matching the proper provider expertise to the
medical activities they are performing, changing participants' health habits and behaviors,
and supporting participant compliance with medical treatment. Without the proper support,
plan participants are at significant risk as they navigate their way through the health care
system. They are like little children who have been given a highway safety manual and asked
to practice crossing the street without any parental guidance.
The total health management process integrates not only an approach to identifying and reducing
health risks, it provides a process that informs and guides plan participants to timely and
appropriate high-quality care. It also represents a major shift from participant passivity to
participant engagement.
Where do employers that want to introduce total health management start? The fuel that drives
the total health management engine is ongoing analysis of medical claims data to identify
individual health risks within the plan population. That information is then provided to
medical professionals to support the identified medical needs on a real-time basis through
medical intervention and better patient management.
Total health management requires thinking beyond the status quo. In fact, everybody involved
in health care delivery has a new role. (See Figure 1 below.) In order to
effectively gain control of rapidly rising medical utilization, total health management
requires employers sponsoring medical plans to become facilitators of employee behavioral
change rather than merely to act as financiers and managers of health care plans. This
approach requires employers to communicate effectively with plan participants to engage
them and encourage them to be active and informed health care consumers. Some employers
have introduced consumer-driven health plans using high deductibles and health reimbursement
accounts to change employee behavior. While the economics of such plans may offer some initial
relief, employers will need to be more proactive in guiding and educating plan participants
about medical decisions in order to achieve significant reductions in cost escalation.

Like any major business problem, addressing the cost of health care may seem overwhelming
and impossible to solve. Fortunately, there is a way to address the challenge of escalating
health care costs that reduces the dependence on cost shifting and benefit cutbacks. However,
the strategy going forward requires a strong partnership between employees and management.
Total health management not only addresses the financial pressures that put stress on operating
budgets, but also affects the way health care services are delivered, how employees are
engaged to be better consumers of health care and how they take better care of their health.
To develop a strategy that will reign in health care costs, employers must begin to aggressively
focus on the cost drivers of the health care cost spiral. The cost-escalation drivers are
easy to identify but are complex to counteract because they are multi-faceted. With the advent
of more sophisticated analytical tools, plan sponsors must address:
- The cost of medical care in a market that lacks competitive forces,
- The quality of care in a market that tolerates something less than evidenced-based
medical solutions and in which practice patterns vary widely,
- Patient care in a market where safety is not given the priority it deserves,
- The delivery of medical services in a market where much of health care provided to employees
is avoidable, not up to recommended levels or totally unnecessary, and
- Changing employee behaviors that lead to poor health.
Finally, it is critical to understand that the average medical plan participant is very
disconnected from the health care system and believes in myths about the health care system.
(See Figure 2 below.) Consumers generally believe that medical professionals
are infallible, not prone to error and that there is little variation in quality from one medical
provider to another. The truth is that there are wide differences in cost and quality among providers.
Studies show that, on average, 50 percent of the time patients receive care that falls short of
accepted professional standards. In addition, high rates of preventable medical errors persist.
(See Figure 3 below.) Those errors add to medical plans' costs.


A New Strategy that
Focuses on What Managed Care Has Not Addressed: Quality
Advocates of total health management argue that the delivery of health care to employees can no
longer be limited to a plan of benefits funneled through a discounted provider network. They
believe that, in the future, plan management will require employers to (1) understand the health
risks of their employee populations; (2) analyze claim and health information to predict future
costs; (3) provide this information to medical professionals to support patient care; and (4)
deliver care to the patient at the highest quality available. All four of these mechanisms are
part of a total health management strategy.
It has long been recognized that medical treatment has the potential to cause harm. For example,
in 2000, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) released To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System,
a report that focused on patient safety and medical provider quality variations2.
A 2004 IOM publication on medical errors, Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care,
reported that an estimated 1 million hospitalized patients are injured each
year in the United States and 98,000 hospitalized patients die as a result of preventable medical
errors3. As many as 137,000 additional
hospital deaths annually have been attributed to drug-related
errors, according to a widely cited study4.
To put the total error-related hospital deaths 225,000 annually due to infections,
medication errors and treatment errors, according to a Johns Hopkins study5
in perspective, it is exactly half the number of people who die annually from all cancer-related
causes and about one-third of the number of people who die from heart-related conditions. It is
the equivalent of 25 people dying every hour of every day of the year. While the issue of patient
safety is shocking when put into context, it has only recently gained considerable public attention.
Various studies have shown that poor medical quality and medical errors add 15 percent to 30 percent
to plan sponsors' medical costs.
The early adopters of total health management are achieving striking results in cost savings and
in the reduction of medical trend. These employers have embraced the role facilitating change
through which they guide plan participants to high-quality, high-performing medical providers who
are motivated to improve personal health of plan participants. Total health management uses programs
that have been around for some time, such as case management, health promotion and wellness, disease
management and medical management. Armed with clinical information, plans can use real-time medical
claims data to support delivering evidence-based health care that is performed by high-quality medical
providers in the right treatment setting at the right time. (See Figure 4 below.)

Moving from Concept to Action
Getting started is sometimes the hardest thing to do. However, once begun, results follow quickly.
To move from talking about the problem to action, these initial five steps are necessary:
- Assess current capabilities of vendors to support a total health management strategy.
- Analyze medical and prescription drug claims data to develop a health risk profile of participant
population and target cost savings opportunities.
- Design and prioritize the elements of total health management strategy to the health risks
identified in the population.
- Select service vendors that are best suited to support the total health management design and hold
them accountable by implementing achievable performance goals (i.e., audit those results).
- Develop a communication strategy for working with employees to improve the medical care they receive,
and to promote healthy living.
Conclusion
The rapidly evolving nature of technology, information and medical management provides
opportunities for employers to contain escalating costs and help manage the quality of
care and the total health of employees. Plan designs can be modified to support desired
behaviors, guide participants to high-quality facilities and lower barriers to appropriate
care. A crucial issue will be to partner with organizations that can support the company
culture as it implements its strategy.
|
 |
|
1 |
After rising health care costs, the next most frequently cited cost pressures were energy
(27 percent) and litigation costs (9 percent). Information about the Business Roundtable's
December 2005 CEO Economic Outlook Survey is available
here.
(To return to the Perspectives text, click here.) |
 |
|
2 |
See To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System ed. Linda T. Kohn, Janet M. Corrigan and
Molla S. Donaldson, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine,
(Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2000), which can be accessed
here.
(To return to the Perspectives text, click here.) |
 |
|
3 |
See Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care ed. Philip Aspden, Janet M.
Corrigan, Julie Wolcott and Shari M. Erickson, Committee on Data Standards for
Patient Safety, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine (Washington,
D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004), which can be accessed
here.
(To return to the Perspectives text, click here.) |
 |
|
4 |
See "Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients: A Meta-analysis of
Prospective Studies" by Jason Lazarou, Bruce H. Pomeranz and Paul N. Corey, Journal
of the American Medical Association 279 (1998):1200-1205, which can be ordered
here.
(To return to the Perspectives text, click here.) |
 |
|
5 |
See "Is US Health Really the Best in the World?" by Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, Journal
of the American Medical Association 284 (2000): 483-485, which can be ordered from the
Web site provided in the preceding endnote.
(To return to the Perspectives text, click here.) |
|
|